Aand fuel needed to pass the winter peak through derogation from the provisions of art. of Law no. republished with subsequent amendments and additions . In support of the unconstitutionality of these legal provisions the constitutional provisions of art. para. according to which Citizens are equal before the law and public authorities without privileges and without discrimination and art. para. regarding guaranteeing and protecting private property equally regardless of the owner. Also considering the motivation of the author of the exception of unconstitutionality included in the written notes as well as.


Decision no. of October published in the Official Gazette of Country Email List Romania Part I no. of January the Court considers as constitutional grounds the provisions of art. para. of the Constitution . . The Court taking into account some preliminary issues observes that although the object of the exception of unconstitutionality as specified in the referral conclusion is the provisions of Law no. for the approval of . regarding the initiation of the insolvency procedure at the Autonomous Directorate for Nuclear Activities DrobetaTurnu Severin from the justification of the exception of unconstitutionality it appears that its author criticizes the measures established by the emergency ordinance confirmed by the approval law by virtue of the provisions of art. and art. para. from the Constitution . . Against this the Court notes that according to the jurisprudence of the.




Constitutional Court the law approving a simple or emergency ordinance forms a common body with it so that in these situations the object of constitutionality control is the Law approving the Ordinance Government emergency and implicitly the approved ordinance itself in its entirety see for example Decision no. of May published in the Official Gazette of Romania Part I no. of June . . Examining the exception.